Along with their colleges and universities, political science departments seek diversification for a variety of reasons. These efforts often amount to millions of dollars of investment (Sinclair Chapman 2015), but utep political science is still dominated by white men. This is not the first time that diversification has been noted. PS: Utep Political Science & Politics published many articles and symposia about diversity issues.
The majority of publications on these topics focus on gender issues. More than 50 articles were published on gender inequalities between 1993 and 2017. However, only a handful of articles dealt with racial or ethnic disparities and other forms of diversity.
The majority of women can make changes in their participation in the field, but people of color are treated as the common denominator for all non-whites because there are not enough non-white scholars to evaluate the data. Utep political science this lack of representation also means that the field cannot address how women from other marginalized groups are affected by compounded inequalities, disenfranchisement, and discrimination.
Figure 2 shows that the average APSA subfield lighting science contains 38% of its female members. However, there is significant dispersion (figure 2). The exceptions are political methodology with 19.92% female membership and women and politics with 91.67%. In fact, 37 subfields of political utep political science are below the average 2013 number of women in academia. Gender disparity is still a problem. 37 out of 44 subfields (reported) fail to achieve parity.
These systemic failures have been exposed by a lot of empirical evidence, but utep public law and political science have not done enough to fix them. While some changes can be made immediately, many solutions will likely require long-term planning. These systemic biases need to be addressed immediately. Training workshops on equal opportunity are not enough.
Our discipline’s inability to properly address these issues may be due to its assumption that diversification is a compromise with academic prestige, scientific excellence, rigor and academic reputation (Alvarez 2017). Diversification and inclusion are not synonymous with scientific excellence or merit. Excellence is not a binary choice.